Texas HB 2256 Makes Possible a New Mediation Procedure for ‘Balance Billing’

By Holly Hayes

Texas House Bill 2256 was signed into law on June 19, 2009 and is effective immediately. The bill provides a procedure for mediation of out-of-network health benefit claim disputes. The law now gives patients the option to mediate when they are “balance-billed” by their insurance company for services provided by out-of-network facility-based physicians like radiologists, pathologists, and neonatologists.  Balance billing occurs when a physician bills a patient for the difference between what the physician charges for a service and what an insurer pays the physician for that service.  When a physician is not in-network for an insurer, there is no contracted payment rate that the physician has agreed to accept from the insurer so the insurer can pay what is deemed appropriate and the patient is billed for the difference.

The Problem

Patients are not always informed when a facility-based physician is out-of-network. Even though services are provided at an in-network facility, patients may be responsible for out-of-network charges for facility-based physicians.  For example, a mother gives birth in the hospital and the next day a neonatologist visits the baby before both are discharged home. If the neonatologist is not part of the hospital preferred provider plan, the mother will be billed for the balance of the amount not covered by insurance. It is unlikely the mother would even consider that the neonatologist visiting her baby - in the hospital - is not included in the hospital’s preferred provider plan.

Facility-based physicians may not be part of a hospital’s preferred provider plan for a variety of reasons.  In testimony for the House Insurance Committee on House Bill 2256 on March 24, 2009, William Hinchey MD, Past President of the Texas Medical Association (TMA), outlined some of the possibilities. Some health plans refuse to acknowledge facility-based provider services as reimbursable services. Sometimes a health plan will sign an exclusive arrangement with a national provider that operates in a different city from the hospital. Reductions in fee schedules, absent negotiation with the facility-based physician, leave the physician with no recourse but to withdraw from the preferred provider plan.

The Solution

HB 2256 gives patients the option to mediate when they are balance-billed. The law allows enrolled members of a preferred provider plan - or a Texas employee health benefit plan that is not a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) - to request mediation for an out-of-network claim settlement if two criteria are met. First, the enrolled was responsible for a payment greater than $1,000 to a facility-based physician after deductibles, co-payments and coinsurance. Second, the facility-based physician provided the service in a hospital that was contracted with the health plan administrator or in a preferred provider hospital.

The new law has implications for healthcare facilities. Healthcare facilities providing facility-based physician services that are out-of-network to a patient are required to notify the patient of the mandatory mediation procedure. Providers are also required to give patients a list of all facility-based physicians who have privileges at the facility and inform patients that these physicians could bill them for amounts not paid by their insurer.

HB 2256 has implications for insurance companies as well. The law requires the insurance commission to adopt rules for an insurer to submit documentation to the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI). Insurers must submit the methods used to compute out-of-network reimbursements and the effect these methods could have on the insured’s out-of-pocket costs.

If a patient requests mediation for an out-of-network claim settlement, a mediator agreed upon by all parties (or appointed by the chief administrative law judge by random assignment) would conduct the mediation. Each party would have an opportunity to state their position. The mediation would consider three issues. First, whether the amount charged by the facility-based physician was excessive.  Second, whether the amount paid by the insurer for the service was the usual and customary rate (UCR) or unreasonably low. Third, whether the amount for which the enrolled is to be responsible is excessive.

In conclusion, HB 2256 now gives patients the option to mediate when they are balance-billed by a facility-based physician. In addition, the bill requires healthcare providers to take steps to inform patients that they may be responsible for facility-based physician fees.  Insurance companies will be required to provide information on how physician reimbursement is determined and any effects this may have on a patient. As a result of HB 2256, patients should now be better informed and will have the option of mediating if they are balance-billed.

Holly Hayes is a mediator at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Experts where she focuses on mediation of health care disputes. Holly holds a B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. She can be reached at: holly@karlbayer.com.

Tags: H.B. 2256, Mediation, Texas Legislation